Saturday, October 07, 2006

The Date Lab Article

For the past several Saturdays, I’ve been slipping out of my apartment early in the morning and creeping down the hall to steal the Washington Post Magazine (and, ok, sometimes I take the comics too) from one of my neighbors. Still in pajamas, I run back into my apartment as noiselessly as possible, and breeze through the Georgetown restaurant reviews and stories about flu vaccines, anxiously searching for the Date Lab column.

I’ve been anticipating the publication of the story about my date for some time now. When the freelance writer who had been assigned to our story called me three weeks ago to ask for an update she mentioned that the article would be published “any day now.” So I wasn’t that surprised this morning when I opened up the magazine and found myself smiling back up at me. “Oh great,” I thought as I read the subtitle: “She’s a food lover who attended culinary school. He’s a devoted calorie-watcher. Drat.”

As a writer, I understand the need to create a character in order to tell a story. However, I must admit that this was my biggest concern about the article. “How are they going to paint me,” I wondered, thinking over the things I’d said in the interview. Evidently, they decided that I was going to be a “food lover” with expensive shoes. Not necessarily inaccurate, but certainly not how I’d describe myself. I was disappointed that they cut out a lot of my funny (at least to me) quotes. During my 30-minute interview, the reporter laughed hysterically when I told her how I blew a fuse and my comment about Rachel Ray. I’d been hoping that some of those lines would make it into the article, but instead I came off sounding shallow and a little snotty. I literally cringed when I read the first line about my being a “stilettos kinda girl.” Yes, I did say that, but it was within the context of explaining how I generally feel more comfortable when I’m dressed up. Also, while I realize that I am in fact from New Jersey, I am fairly confident that I stopped using the word “shady” sometime in the fall of my sophomore year of high school. I believe the actual word I used was “sketchy.”

I think what struck me most about the article is the fact that I learned more about Alfredo from his handful of quotations than I did throughout the course of our date. He explained in his interview that he was trying to “keep it simple,” but would it have not made sense for him, upon learning that I had been to culinary school, to mention that he writes about food and nutrition? Within context, his seemingly freakish obsession with the portion sizes would have seemed less so. He described himself in his questionnaire as a former “super-nice, chubby guy” and mentioned that he’d had his heart broken several times. Now he writes about nutrition and seems horrified by the idea of cleaning off his plate. You don’t need to be a shrink to connect those dots… Looking back at it, it was his refusal to volunteer any information about himself that really made me dislike him. Had he mentioned the food thing or the fact that he had a friend coming in from out of town, I would have understood. But as it was, I was forced to fill in the blanks, and that didn’t work out in his favor.

Overall, the article wasn’t that bad. I think they could have done a better job selecting quotes from my questionnaire and they mixed up the part about my “dream date” with the answer for my “usual physical type,” which again, made me look a little shallow. For the record, my actual answer to that question was:

“Basically, I just want a male version of me—and I want him to look like Dermot Mulroney. Actually, I was watching the movie Prime the other day and totally fell for the guy that Uma Thurman dates in that movie…the cute, quirky wit, sexy boyish looks, NY accent, with an artsy side. I love that. Other options: Mr. Darcy as played by Colin Firth, Cary Grant’s character in The Philadelphia Story.”

At least the picture wasn’t that bad, although I wish I’d had time to straighten my hair. You’ve probably noticed that I added a picture of myself to my blogger profile. I figured that once you’ve been outed by the second largest newspaper in the country there really is no point in grasping for those last few traces of anonymity.

Go check out the article—I’m interested to hear what you guys think about it.

13 comments:

Boutros said...

I much preferred your account of the date. I still can't believe he was texting away under the table. Rude.

And "go empty out again." Still makes me shake my head...

Velvet said...

You sound fine honey. I'm impressed you own Manolo's. I would love to buy a pair, but I can't part with the money! I'm skeeeerd.

That guy was such a dick, texting is so not acceptable, that hopefully he learned a lesson. You did good. Look, you got out there and you tried it. But like I said earlier, I wouldn't let the Post pick out my underwear, much less a date! Good for you for giving it a try.

Asian Mistress said...

I'm impressed you did that...people tell me I should do Date Lab but I'm scared - real name, occupation used and all. Plus I'd be mortified if the guy made me sound awful - but as you pointed out there are two sides to every story...

PS - the pic the Post used of you was awful...you look much better in your blogger pic! :)

Fiorella aka Sara said...

I think they rode the whole being '23 and young' thing.

I'm glad the ONE correct observation of his was that you were intelligent! Bravo Alfredo!!

We all agree that he was rude with the texting under the table. No more to comment about that. You could also tell he had some set views on things from the beginning: portion size, keeping his answers simple on first dates, etc. The friend coming in from Ireland would have been completely understandable had he said "Excuse me I dont mean to be rude but I might have to take a phone call or two due to .... etc". Its just common courtesy. For something as important as that he should have probably laid out his plans beforehand knowing he was going to be on a date that evening.

If he were to be a bit more polite and open up more to first date questions he may not have such a tough time getting to second dates.....

Washington Cube said...

Hey Velvet and AM! :)

I found my way over here after reading the Post article. The fact that the newspaper glommed onto odd facts and misquoted you is hardly surprising. They do it all of the time.

You didn't come off sounding shallow at all...at least not to me, but then I'm also a stiletto's kind of girl. Your date, on the other hand, came off sounding like a first class dullard and creep. First of all, if it was his intent to meet someone later that night, why was the date scheduled then? Is this something he agreed to, knowing he would be engaged later, or was the date set by the Post (which I find hard to believe.) The fact that he was texting during the meal and going off to make phone calls while with you was flat out rude and unacceptable. I was surprised you gave him a "3." Frankly, I thought you were being generous. You nailed it on his food issues. Dr. Freud? White courtesy phone. Hello??? All too obvious. You floating above this one. He sank.

Ted said...

I think you look great in the post pic and your blog pic. Such eyes; so easy to get lost in.

Anonymous said...

I've crossed paths with this guy before. Your assessment of him and the way he was portrayed in the article are very accurate. He's a jerk. Didn't realize how lame though until now! I didn't think the article made you look bad. Kudos for calling him on his evasiveness (one of my biggest dating pet peeves and a sure-fire red flag).

Freckled K said...

I didn't think the article made you look bad at all. He, on the other hand, came off as someone who was socially awkward and without manners. Don't sweat it, hon. You did fine.

armo said...

I think the Post looks like the biggest loser. It's like they looked at what box you both checked under "ethnicity" and ignored everything else. Not impressive; let's hope the rest of their staff pays more attention to the details. Also, that guys sounds like he wasn't really into the experience of being set up -- I don't think he would have been more fun to hang out with under any circumstances. Bad reporting, but at least you got a free meal out of it.

You came out looking like a normal person who was disappointed, and the guy just came across as obnoxious.

NotCarrie said...

Is it online, too?

VP of Dior said...

it is online, i just read it under "Buck's Fishing and Camping."

i'm a first time visitor to your blog and am so impressed by your culincary school background and love of tuscany (i could eat northern italian food every day of my life).

as for the date, i think you came out sounding very intelligent and classy while he looks like a huge tool. poor form on his part for being socially awkward and texting while on a date. this kind of person is what scares me about dating in DC!

and my last thought is that the WaPo editors are no better than reality show producers who try to create ridiculous scenarios and pass them off as "real."

Matt said...

As we all know and agree Alejandra, you are a rockstar, and this guy was a wedge (the simplest of all tools). Though I have to say the article did not paint you in the kindest of lights, the simple fact is, this guy sucked - and the article did allow that to come through. So no worries dear, you are still #1 in our books no matter what!

avocadoinparadise said...

Nice recap! Thanks for sharing & I"m glad I came across your version of events from the dc universe blog.

Now, my one question is why the guys on these dates are always jerks or egomaniacs. Seriously, it seems to me that all the ladies in dc are normal and the guys are freaks! How depressing!!

Blog Widget by LinkWithin